ESG Reporting Intelligence Logo

Environmental, Social & Governance applied to corporates against commercial credit risks

by | May 20, 2022 | ESG

Over the past five years discussion around the role of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) in credit risk has become a sticking point with qualitative considerations and forecasts becoming material in risk analysis. A report by Macquarie Group has shown that securities with low ESG scores generally show greater volatility returns than securities with high ESG scores. The United Nations Principles of Responsible Investment (UN PRI) have a signatory list for ESG in Credit Ratings Statement now supported by over 130 investors (US $26trn in AUM) and by 16 credit rating agencies[1]

As Macquarie mention, securities with a low ESG score averaged a standard deviation score of 32.4, whilst securities with a high ESG score averaged a 26.9. This difference is most notable with BBB rated securities, with a +15.5 difference in standard deviation score between the highest and lowest ESG scores. Based on these differences, ESG scores of securities can be a tool of assistance when determining potential return volatility, and a flag for further investigation from credit analysts.[2]

The Macquarie Group also states the governance aspect of ESG ratings in securities to have already been properly priced, and that no alpha returns remain to be extracted. This is because governance has traditionally been a factor of assessment in credit risk analysis. Outside of governance, the benefits of delving into company’s environmental and social information (other than those used in public scores) will deliver better returns for investors whilst also strengthening their portfolio with ESG characteristics.

Variable factors will also play a role in measuring the effect of social and governance levels of risk, such as an entity’s sector, geographical location and characteristics of the instrument. S&P mention in the two year period from 2015 to 2017 there were more than 1000 corporate ratings for which an environmental or social factor was an important element in their rating analysis.[3]

The key factors investors are looking to see ESG addressed by corporates and projects consist of:

  • Incorporate ESG factors into investment analysis & decision making processes;

  • Seek appropriate disclosure and transparency on ESG issues;

  • Reporting on activities and progress towards implementing ESG risk management processes.

As sustainability reporting becomes an essential requirement for businesses to attract investors over time, technology and availability of data will become more accessible to businesses of all sizes and market capitalisations. New models for ratings will also begin to mature, and quantitative ESG ratings will shift from avoiding risk to capturing opportunity. Due to the long-term nature of ESG risks, combining ESG information with a fundamental analysis particularly compliments buy-and-hold strategies, with their concerns about bond liquidity and issuers’ strategic and business risks.




Contact us to discuss how your organisation can reduce ESG risks, create an effective ESG strategy, reduce their carbon footprint and better manage ESG risk in your supply chain.

Recent Posts

Introduction of CSRD in the European Union

by | Mar 20, 2024 | ESG | 0 Comments

The introduction of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) on January 1st, 2024, marks a significant milestone in the European Union’s approach towards...

EU LIFE Programme: Funding of green projects

by | Mar 20, 2024 | ESG | 0 Comments

The LIFE Programme serves as the European Union's financial tool dedicated to environmental and climate action. Since its inception in 1992, it has actively nurtured...

European Union: Import and International Supply Chains

by | Mar 20, 2024 | ESG | 0 Comments

In a globalised world with large international supply chains many companies are facing risks related to supplier management. ESG Reporting Intelligence offers European...

Workplace Health and Safety

by | Mar 9, 2024 | ESG | 0 Comments

The resilient workforce of an organisation guarantees a strong foundation for an organisation to sustain and flourish not only when the sailing is smooth but also in...

Working from Home: The New Path to Achieving “Net Zero” Emissions, Focusing on Scope 1, 2, and 3

by | Mar 9, 2024 | ESG | 0 Comments

In recent years, the concept of achieving net zero emissions has gained significant traction as the world grapples with the urgent need to mitigate climate change....

Understanding DEI Policies and Tracking DEI Data Amid Changing Regulations

by | Mar 9, 2024 | ESG | 0 Comments

In today's diverse and inclusive world, organisations recognise the importance of implementing robust Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) policies. Its significance...

The Why Behind Limited Global ESG Audits at First: Explained

by | Mar 9, 2024 | ESG | 0 Comments

The world, as we know it today, needs to take sweeping steps to prevent environmental degradation. The concerted efforts of multinational companies in this direction...

The Proliferation of Climate-Related Risk: Special Reference to TCFD

by | Mar 9, 2024 | ESG | 0 Comments

In recent years, the world has witnessed an alarming increase in the frequency and severity of climate-related events. From extreme weather events to rising sea levels...

Safeguarding Digital Privacy: Balancing Convenience and Security

by | Mar 8, 2024 | ESG | 0 Comments

In the modern digital era, where technology permeates every aspect of our lives, ensuring digital privacy has become paramount. With the growing dependence on the...